<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browserstats - reliable?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dionaea.com/blog/archives/2006/01/16/browserstats-reliable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dionaea.com/blog/archives/2006/01/16/browserstats-reliable/</link>
	<description>My thoughts and whatever about random topics.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Svein KÃ¥re</title>
		<link>http://dionaea.com/blog/archives/2006/01/16/browserstats-reliable/#comment-898</link>
		<dc:creator>Svein KÃ¥re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionaea.com/blog/?p=144#comment-898</guid>
		<description>Opera &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; present itself as IE by default, to be able to get past badly written browser checks. Admittedly not completely, as it's possible to see that it's Opera - but there is also another mode, where Opera can be disguised completely, as either IE or Netscape. This is rarely used though, and most statistics software does manage to figure out when Opera is used, when it's going be the default disguise.

Still, there are other other possibilities that may cause Opera to be somewhat undercounted (like the aggressive cache) but how big role these possibilities play, I guess it's impossible to know. 

But I do wonder if the situation share some similarities as with the "Speeder" in the example over...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera <em>does</em> present itself as <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym> by default, to be able to get past badly written browser checks. Admittedly not completely, as it&#8217;s possible to see that it&#8217;s Opera - but there is also another mode, where Opera can be disguised completely, as either <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym> or Netscape. This is rarely used though, and most statistics software does manage to figure out when Opera is used, when it&#8217;s going be the default disguise.</p>
<p>Still, there are other other possibilities that may cause Opera to be somewhat undercounted (like the aggressive cache) but how big role these possibilities play, I guess it&#8217;s impossible to know. </p>
<p>But I do wonder if the situation share some similarities as with the &#8220;Speeder&#8221; in the example over&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://dionaea.com/blog/archives/2006/01/16/browserstats-reliable/#comment-897</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dionaea.com/blog/?p=144#comment-897</guid>
		<description>Interesting questions.  Another thing to consider is that Opera can present itself as another browser, for example, mine is impersonating IE.  Correct me if I'm wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting questions.  Another thing to consider is that Opera can present itself as another browser, for example, mine is impersonating <acronym title="Internet Explorer">IE</acronym>.  Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
